Abstract

Introduction: Self-medication is an important aspect of self-care. It is a common practice in society and medical students are no exception. The aim of this study was to explore the knowledge and practice of self-medication among students of a medical school in Western Nepal.


Methods: A cross sectional study was conducted among basic science and clinical students after obtaining prior consent from those willing to participate. Respondents’ degree of agreement with a set of 25 statements was noted using Likert scale to assess their knowledge. The practice of self-medication was studied by asking about the use of selected groups of medicines during the past one-year period and noting the pattern of use.


Results: Three hundred and thirty of the 356 students (92.6%) participated in the study. Mean knowledge score was 93.2 (SD = 8.1). Self-medication was practiced by 83.3% (n = 275) of respondents. Knowledge about self-medication differed among respondents according to gender (p = 0.03) and nationality (p = 0.04) but not other variables. Practice of self-medication was associated with father’s profession (p = 0.03) and nationality of the respondents (p = 0.04).


Conclusions: Students’ knowledge about self-medication was good and they commonly practiced self-medication. Pain-killers were the most commonly used drug.

Keywords: knowledge, medical students, Nepal, practice, self medication

INTRODUCTION:

Self-medication is an important element of self-care. It incorporates both selection and use of medicines including herbal preparations and traditional products for the treatment of self-identified illness or persistent use of the physician (or other prescribers) prescribed medicines for chronic or recurring diseases.[1] Some adverse consequences of inappropriate self-medication can be: Incorrect self-diagnosis, failure to obtain the right medical consultation, incorrect treatment choice, failure to identify contraindications, interactions, adverse effects, inappropriate route and dosage, and risk of dependence.[2] However, responsible practice of self-medication can save medical resources, money, and the time spent on health care for minor illness.[3] Self-medication among medical students may be more common because they may have better knowledge about diseases and greater access to medicine.[4]

As the medical undergraduates are the future generation of prescribers, it is important to obtain information about their self-medication knowledge and practices.[3] But there is a paucity of recent information regarding self-medication practice among medical students in Western Nepal. Hence, this study was conducted to assess knowledge and practice of self-medication among undergraduate medical students of a Medical College in that region and note the variation in knowledge and practice of self-medication among different sub-groups of respondents, if any.

METHODS:

A cross-sectional study was conducted at Lumbini Medical College and Teaching Hospital (LMCTH) among medical undergraduates of second, fourth, sixth, and eighth semesters from April to July 2016. Data from respondents of second and fourth semesters were collected during April and May while those of sixth and eight semesters during June and July respectively. Convenience sampling technique was adopted to include all the students who were willing to participate. LMCTH is affiliated to Kathmandu University and conducts a five and a half years’ Bachelors of Medicine and Bachelors of Surgery (MBBS) course as its core program.The program includes study of the basic sciences for two years, clinical study for two and a half years, and one year of compulsory rotating internship. The institution enrolls 100 students annually for the MBBS course.

The principal author collected the data from the respondents in the lecture halls during the breaks after the routine lecture hours. The purpose of the study and details on the questionnaire was explained to the respondents. After a verbal consent and assuring about the confidentiality of their information, the questionnaires were distributed to the respondents, asked to fill it up by themselves, and return it after thirty minutes.

The major tool for the study was a pretested questionnaire prepared after an extensive review of literature. A similar questionnaire was used before.[1,5] In this study, certain modifications were carried out such that only knowledge was assessed but not perception as this term is abstract and statements may not be able to adequately study perception. Hence, the number of statements were reduced to 25 from 40 after excluding those which were supposed to assess perception in previous studies.[1,5]

The modified questionnaire consisted of two sections. First section obtained personal and background information about the participants. Second section had a set of twenty-five statements to assess the knowledge. The practice of self-medication was studied by enquiring about the use of selected groups of medicines during the previous one year period and noting down the pattern of use.[5] Analgesics, skin ointments, antipyretics, anti-allergics, antibiotics, vitamins and tonics, ayurvedic medicines, and other group of drugs were studied. The respondents were asked whether they self-medicated with any of the above mentioned drug or drugs during the previous one year. If their answer was yes, they were further enquired about how frequently they self-medicated (Nearly all the time, once a week, once a month, every three months, every six months).

For assessing knowledge, the respondents were asked to provide a score ranging from 1 to 5 (whole numbers only) according to their degree of agreement with each statement where 1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = neutral, 4 = agree and, 5 = strongly agree. Statements seven and 12 were negatively worded and their scores reversed while calculating the total score to reduce bias. Knowledge was calculated by adding the scores of each of the 25 statements.

Reliability testing was done by a group of faculty members of LMCTH. Further, pretesting of the questionnaire was done among forty students of fifth semester who were not included in the study. Cronbach’s alpha was calculated as a measure of reliability.

Ethical clearance:

Ethical clearance was obtained from the Institutional Review Committee (IRC) of LMCTH.

Statistical analysis:

The data entry and analysis was done using statistical package for social sciences (SPSS) version 16 for windows. One sample Kolmogorov Smirnov Test was used to check whether the data was normally distributed. Independent sample t-test was used to compare the mean scores between dichotomous variables, while analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for groups with more than two subgroups. Pearson correlation was used to check the relation between two continuous variables while Chi-square test was used to check the association between two categorical variables. Statistical significance was allocated at a p value less than 0.05.

RESULTS:

A total of 330 out of 356 candidates responded to the study. Mean age was 20.83 years (SD = 1.7). Male respondents (n = 188, 57%) outnumbered females (n = 142, 43%). Majority of the respondents (n = 273, 83%) were Nepalese and belonged to urban areas (n = 274, 83%). Most of the respondents’ parents were from non-health related professions. Table 1 provides details of the respondents’ demographic characteristics.

Table 1.

Demographic profile of the respondents ( N = 330)

Variables n ( % )
Gender Male 188 (57)
Female 142 (43)
Nationality Nepalese 273 (83.6)
Indian 54 (16.4)
Family Home Urban 274 (83)
Rural 56 (17)
Father’s Profession Health related 58 (17.6)
Non-health related 272 (82.4)
Mother’s Profession Health related 28 (8.5)
Non-health related 162 (49.1)
Housewife 140 (42.4)
Semester of study Second 87 (26.4)
Fourth 96 (29.1)
Sixth 75 (22.7)
Eighth 72 (21.8)

Knowledge score was found to follow a normal distribution by one-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (Z = 1.5, p = 0.08). Hence, mean was used as the measure of central tendency and standard deviation as the measure of variance. The overall mean knowledge score was 93.26 (SD = 8.16).

Relationship between mean knowledge score and various variables is shown in Table 2. It shows that female students had a statistically significantly higher mean knowledge score as compared to that of male (p = 0.03). Similarly, students who came to study medicine from India had significantly higher mean knowledge score as compared to Nepali students (p = 0.03). There was no statistically significant relationship between mean knowledge score and other variables like urban or rural background, father’s profession, mother’s profession, and semester of study.

Table 2.

Mean knowledge score of self-medication among various subgroups of respondents ( N = 330)

Variables Mean ( SD ) Statistics
Gender Male 92.45 (8.4) t = -2.10, df = 317.9, p = 0.03
Female 94.32 (7.6)
Nationality Nepalese 91.07 (8.0) t = -2.09, df = 73.1, p = 0.03
Indian 93.68 (8.4)
Family Home Urban 93.51 (8.2) t = 1.28, df = 81.5, p = 0.2
Rural 92.02 (7.8)
Father’s Profession Health related 93.17 (7.0) t = -0.98, df = 95.3, p = 0.9
Non-health related 93.28 (8.3)
Mother’s Profession Health related 93.93 (5.2) F = 0.52, df = 2, p = 0.59
Non-health related 93.60 (8.5)
Housewife 92.73 (8.2)
Semester of study Second 92.94 (8.1) F = 1.82, df = 3, p = 0.14
Fourth 94.80 (7.7)
Sixth 92.03 (9.1)
Eighth 92.86 (7.3)

Fig 1.

Figure showing linear relationship between age and knowledge score

A total of 275 respondents (83.3%) were found to practice self-medication during past one year period. As shown in Table 3, the prevalence of self-medication was significantly higher among Nepalese respondents as compared to Indians. Similarly, respondents whose fathers were not in health-related professions had a significantly higher self-medication practice.

Table 3.

Prevalence of self-medication practice based on demographic profile ( N = 330)

Variables Self-medication Statistics
Yes No
Gender Male 156 (82.9) 32 (17) X 2 = 0.04, df = 1, p = 0.84
Female 119 (83.8) 23 (16.1)
Nationality Nepalese 245 (85.6) 41 (14.3) X 2 = 3.98, df = 1, p = 0.04
Indian 40 (75) 14 (25)
Family Home Urban 227 (82.8) 47 (17.1) X 2 = 0.27, df = 1, p = 0.6
Rural 48 (85.7) 8 (14.2)
Father’s Profession Health related 43 (74.1) 15 (25.8) X 2 = 4.28, df = 1, p = 0.03
Non-health related 232 (85.2) 40 (14.7)
Mother’s Profession Health related 21 (75) 7 (25) X 2 = 2.25, df = 2, p = 0.32
Non-health related 139 (85.8) 23 (14.1)
Housewife 115 (82.1) 25 (17.8)
Semester of study Second 75 (86.2) 12 (13.7) X 2 = 2.69, df = 3, p = 0.44
Fourth 77 (80) 19 (20)
Sixth 60 (80) 15 (20)
Eighth 63 (87.5) 9 (12.5)

Table 4 provides details about the practice of self-medication by the respondents. The most commonly used medicine for self-medication was pain-killers (n = 198, 60%). It was followed by antipyretics, skin ointments, and vitamins and tonics. Antibiotics and anti-allergics were equally used for self-medication. Apart from allopathic drugs, 80 (24.24%) respondents also self-medicated with ayurvedic drugs.

Table 4.

Practice of self-medication (Frequency of use of selected medicines for common health problems, N = 330)

Drugs Frequency of use of drug
Nearly all the time Once a week Every month Every 3 months Every 6 months Total**
Painkillers 3 (0.9) 7 (2.1) 22 (6.7) 71 (21.5) 95 (28.8) 198 (71.5)
Skin Ointment 6 (1.8) 7 (2.1) 15 (4.5) 38 (11.5) 38 (11.5) 106 (38.3)
Against fever 4 (1.2) 4 (1.2) 8 (2.4) 60 (18.2) 95 (28.8) 175 (63.2)
Anti-allergic 3 (0.9) 4 (1.2) 3 (0.9) 36 (10.9) 45 (13.6) 94 (33.9)
Anti-microbials 0 3 (0.9) 2 (0.6) 39 (11.8) 47 (14.2) 94 (33.9)
Vitamins and tonics 4 (1.2) 5 (1.5) 7 (2.1) 43 (13.0) 34 (10.3) 97 (35)
Ayurvedic medicines 6 (1.8) 4 (1.2) 2 (0.6) 25 (7.6) 39 (11.8) 80 (28.9)
Others 1 (0.3) 1 (0.3) 3 (0.9) 0 0 7 (2.5)
** The total percentage is more than 100 due to multiple responses to each question.

DISCUSSION:

This study enrolled 330 respondents out of 356 students in basic science and clinical years. The mean knowledge score was 93.2 (maximum score being 125) indicating a good knowledge score. The practice of self-medication among the respondents was found to be high.

Studies regarding self-medication practice and knowledge among medical students have been carried out. A study by Shankar et al. performed on 125 premedical and undergraduate medical students showed mean knowledge score, perception, and total scores of 73.45, 62.75, and 136.2 (maximum possible scores of 105, 95, and 200) respectively.[5] While Gyawali et al. found mean knowledge, attitude, and total score of 74.54, 67.18, and 141.73 (maximum possible scores of 100, 100, and 200 respectively.[1] The results were different from the findings in our study due to difference in the number of statements (25 versus 20 for knowledge assessment). Mehta et al. showed that more than half of the respondents had a good knowledge about self-medication, the attitude was positive and they favored self-medication saying that it was acceptable.[3] On the contrary a study by James et al. showed that the knowledge of the respondents about self-medication was poor, the practice was common and inappropriate however the respondents had adequate knowledge about the benefits and risks of self-medication.[6] Another important finding was females had better knowledge of self-medication compared to males. The knowledge of the Indian respondents was found to be higher than Nepalese in the present study unlike the findings of Gyawali et al. and Shankar et al. where no such association of knowledge with gender or nationality was mentioned.[1,5] In the present study, the Indian respondents accounted for only 16.4% of the total. This could have had an influence on the results.

In this study, though there was variation in mean knowledge between students of different semesters, they were not statistically significant which is in congruence with the findings by Shankar et al.[5] A study by Gyawali et al. showed that the fourth semester students had better knowledge about self-medication compared to second semester (p < 0.05) and they stated that knowledge increases as the level of education increases.[1] Another study by Sontakke et al. compared the pattern of self-medication among first and third year medical students which showed that senior students had better knowledge than juniors but the juniors were also well aware about self-medication suggesting medical education can have positive effect on the knowledge about self-medication.[7]

Studies on self-medication practice show a wide range of results with the prevalence ranging from 26.2% to 92%.[8,9] In the present study, self-medication was practiced by 83.3% of the respondents which was comparable to the prevalence of 82.3% and 79.9% in the study done in India and Serbia respectively.[10,11] The present study showed significant differences in prevalence of self-medication based on the profession of the father of the respondents. Profession and educational status of father can influence the self-medication practice among their children which might be because of our conservative and patriarchal society similar to the reasons provided in the Serbian research.[11] However, contrary to expectation, a greater proportion of students with fathers not in health-related professions self-medicated. Lesser percent of Indians was found to self-medicate compared to Nepalese students in the present study which might be due to the fear of untoward consequences of self-medication when they are staying away from their home and in the absence of their parents. However, the Indian respondents had a higher knowledge about self-medication compared to their Nepalese counterparts.

Other studies also show increased self-medication practice with progress to higher level of medical education as mentioned by James et al. between second and fourth semester students (p = 0.02), Banerjee et al. between first and fourth year (p < 0.001), and another study done in Slovania between first year and final year (p = 0.038).[6,12,13] However, the present study did not find any significant differences in prevalence of self-medication among junior and senior medical students similar to the study done in Aruba by Shankar et al. and Nagpur, India by Sontakke et al.[5,7]

Analgesics was reported as the most widely used group of drugs for self-medication in the study by Mehta et al. (75%)[3] James et al. (81.3%),[6] Badiger et al. (71%),[9] similar to the present study (71.5%). This trend of analgesic self-use can lead to drug tolerance, dependence (with opioids) and also may mask the actual diagnosis of the underlying disease. The use of antibiotics is also a matter of concern in the present study though the percentage was much lower than that of the studies by Patil et al. and Vedrana et al. where antibiotics have been identified as the most commonly self-medicated group of drugs.[14,15] This may be the outcome of poor implementation of strict regulatory policy on the over the counter sales of antibiotics in those nations.

We recommend that modifications in teaching-learning methodology be planned to increase the level of idea and concept among medical students regarding self-medication so that they can benefit their patients in the future and secure rational practices in their profession.

Limitations:

Recall bias may be the major drawback as the students were asked to provide the information of drugs used for self-medication during the preceding one year. The present study did not include the respondents from other faculties like nursing. A comparative study could be planned involving different health science faculties regarding self-medication in LMCTH. Respondents could have interacted with each other while completing the questionnaire.

The high response rate was the strength of the study.

CONCLUSION:

Undergraduate medical students have a good knowledge about self-medication and more than 80% of them practice it. Painkillers were the most self-medicated drug. This is a very delicate issue in medical profession because these future prescribers are the ones who maintain public trust in pharmacotherapy and contribute to maintaining health of the population.

Additional Info:

Competing interest:

None declared

Financial disclosure:

No funds were available