Sinnatamby CS. Last’s anatomy: Regional and Applied. 12th ed. Edinburgh Churchill Livingstone, 2011;349:503–12.
Ukoha UU, Egwu OA, Ndukwe GU, Akudu LS, Umeasalugo KE. Anthropometric study of the nose in a student population. Ann Bioanthropol.2016;4(1):8. DOI: 10.4103/2315- 7992.190461.
Jeremic D, Kocic S, Vulovic M, Sazdanovic M, Sazdanovic P, Jovanovic B et al. Anthropometric Study Of The Facial Index In The Population Of Central Serbia. Arch Biol Sci. 2013;65(3):1163- 8. DOI: 10.2298/ABS1303163J
Gray H. Sexual and geographic variation in the skull. In: Standring S. Gray’s Anatomy. The Anatomical basis of clinical practice. 39 ed. London: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier, 2008;488p.
Franciscus RG, Long JC. Variation in human nasal height and breadth. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1991;85(4):419‐27. PMID: 1928315.
Kumari KL, Babu PV, Kumari PK, Nagamani M. A study of cephalic index and facial index in Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India. Int J Res Med Sci. 2015;3(3):656-8.
Martin R, Saller K. Lehrbuch der Anthropologie, 3rd ed. Gustav Fischer Verlag: Stuttgart; 1957: P 11.
Ray SK, Saha K, Kumar A, Banjare S. Anthropometric Study of Nasal Index among the Population of Western Uttar Pradesh Region. Int J Sci Stud. 2016;4(2):65-70. DOI: 10.17354/ ijss/2016/254.
Hegazy AA. Anthropometric study of nasal index of Egyptians. Int J Anat Res. 2014; 2(4):761-7. DOI: 10.16965/ ijar.2014.544
Asharani SK, Hiremarali LT, Rajendra R, Surendra M. Study of Nansal Index Among Students of Tertiary Medical Care Institute in Southern India. Int J Anat Res. 2015;3(4):1675- 9. DOI: 10.16965/ijar.2015.314.
Sparks CZ, Jantz RL. A reassessment of human cranial plasticity: Boas revisited. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2002;99(23):14636–9. PMID: 12374854. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.222389599
Shrestha O, Bhattacharya S, Jha N, Dhungel S, Jha CB, Shrestha S, Shrestha U. Cranio facial anthropometric measurements among Rai and Limbu community of Sunsari District, Nepal. Nepal Med Coll J. 2009;11(3):183-5. PMID: 20334066
Koirala S, Shah S, Khanal L. Nasal index of the Tharu and Mongoloid population of Nepal: A cross sectional study. Russian Open Med J. 2014;3:1-3. DOI: 10.15275/rusomj.2014.0302
Oladipo GS, Eroje MA, Fawehinmi HB. Anthropometric comparison of the nasal indices between the Adoni and Okrika ethnic groups of Rivers state, Nigeria. Int J Med Sci. 2009;1:135–7. Available online http://www.academicjournals.org/ijmms
Wai MM, Thwin SS, Yesmin T, Ahmad A, Adnan AS, Hassan AA, et al. Nasofacial Anthropometric Study among University Students of Three Races in Malaysia. Adv Anat. 2015;1-5. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/780756
Yesmin T, Thwin SS, Afrin Urmi S, Wai MM, Zaini PU, Azwan K. A study of facial index among Malay population. J Anthropol. 2014. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/726974
Kurnia C, Susiana S, Husin W. Facial indices in Chinese ethnic students aged 20-22. J Dent Indones. 2013 Aug 20;19(1):1-4. DOI: https://doi/org/10.14693/jdi.v19i1.121
Shetti VR, Pai SR, Sneha GK, Gupta C, Chethan P. Study of Prosopic (Facial) Index of Indian and Malaysian Students. Int J Morphol. 2011;29(3):1018–21. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022011000300060.
Ekwere EO, Yohanna UM, Lawal IS. A study of the nasal index of Berom students in Plateau State Polytechnic, Jos. Ann Bioanthropol. 2015;3:70- 2. DOI: 10.4103/2315-7992.174014.
Mohammed I, Mokhtari T, Ijaz S, Ngaski AA, Milanifard M, Hassanzadeh G. Anthropometric study of nasal index in Hausa ethnic population of northwestern Nigeria. J Contemp Med Sci. 2018 Mar 26;4(1). Available online http://www.jocms.org/index.php/jcms/article/view/327
Jovanović J, Jeremić D, Jovanović B, Maja V, Sazdanović P, Maja S, et al. Nasal morphological characteristics of the Serbian population. Arch Biol Sci. 2014;66:227-34. DOI:10.2298/ABS1401227J
Jeyaseelann N, Mohammed I, Chin WL, Liyanage RMP, Kanesh KP, Zainab F. Facial Index Among the Ethnic Races of Malaysian Population - An Anthropometric Study. J Dent Med Sci. 2016;15(12):97-101. DOI: 10.9790/0853-15120897101.
- Abstract viewed - 152 times
- pdf downloaded - 38 times
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.It permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
© 2019; Sudikshya KC.
How to Cite
Nasal Parameters and Facial Index in Medical Undergraduates: A Cross Sectional Study
Vol 7 No 2 (2019)
Submitted: Jun 3, 2019
Accepted: Nov 21, 2019
Published: Dec 30, 2019
Section: Original Research Article
Introduction: Face has priority in identification of an individual. Nose occupying the middle of face is an
important sense organ that helps in respiration. Nose and face can be classified into different types according
to nasal index and facial index. The aim of this study was to analyze nose and face type and find out its
dominance in different sex of Nepalese and Indian population. Methods: This was a quantitative observational
study conducted on 156 medical students using simple sampling method. Data were collected then nasal
index and facial index were calculated. Descriptive statistical data i.e. mean, standard deviation, together
with the independent-samples t-test results for anthropometric variables of nasal and facial parameters in
sex and Nationality (Nepalese and Indian) were analyzed. Results: All the measurement values were more
in males compared to females, but the sexual dimorphism in nasal index (male 76.25 ± 7.75, female 75.70
± 8.05) and facial index (male 85.77 ± 8.1, female 82.97 ± 7.63) is not statistically significant. Chi-square
test revealed significant difference in face type among Nepalese and Indian population. Mesorrhine was
the most common type of nose in both the population. Nepalese had commonly euryprosopic type of face
while Indians had hypereuryprosopic type of face. Conclusion: Sexual dimorphism was not significant in
both nasal and facial parameters while type of face was helpful in differentiation of Nepalese and Indian